Tracing the evolution of the human diet from our earliest ancestors can lead to a better understanding of human adaptation in the …
source
Tracing the evolution of the human diet from our earliest ancestors can lead to a better understanding of human adaptation in the …
source
Input your search keywords and press Enter.
47 comments
The meat from herbivores and omnivores is the same but not from carnivores.
Seems impossible to nail down the perfect nutritional foods when we all evolved from ancestors from so many different geological locations. The diets in these areas are wide and varied.
The Inuits of North America subsisted on nearly all meat. The Japanese ate a LOT of fish. I suppose if your DNA says you are mostly from one area of the globe, this approach may have some validity. If your DNA is from all over the place, your diet will have to be assessed by more trial and error.
Did humans adapt to the food available to them and over time their bodies "learned" to process these foods nutritionally? For instance, lets say a "tribe" of humans in 4600 B.C. has to leave an area for whatever reason into an area with a totally different diet. Their bodies are not used to these foods and may not agree with them as they have been eating other foods for centuries. Does the first generation to the new area struggle nutritionally from the new diet and over time the following generations adapt via a nutritional evolution of sorts?
The comments would suggest that for a science lecture this video seems to have attracted an inordinate number of morons.
💎
4 minutes in and listening to this hag lying saying hunter gathers died at 30 years old. Really shows complete ignorance. I don't have time for nonsense.
Hunters gathers that's why humans were healthy dependent on the hand of God to feed them not man
cave man I am. And when I see a canine tooth I see a predator or a scavenger not a animal that can't defend themselves
M ‘😊yup
Hon ok on I 😊
O
Inning
WE NEED TO GET OFF THE FAMILY TREE ANALOGY
( if humans were a plant, we would be just a branch cut off a non-existent tree ) and that doesn't even correlate well, dare i say animals are not plants???
he "robust australopiths" need to be set out.
the problem is in old data interpretation under linear theory.
how does dimensional analysis determine if something evolved from something, or joined with something ??? ( where hominin criteria is bi-pedalism )
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS COULD NOT MAKE THAT DISTINCTION, ONE WAY OR THE OTHER !!!
science gives us a figure of roughly 4 million years of species separation, before interbreeding could not occur.
*to the contrary, the "robust australopiths" mark an introduction of Species Invasive DNA, they Did Not "evolve from" australopiths * <—prove that statement wrong if you can.
it was a hybridization with something ill-adapted to the hominin evolutionary niche.
a hybridization with something that would breed faster than the food grows if it could ( not a survivable human characteristic; a non-feasible, Spices Invasive Component )
* that whole category, currently referred to as "robust australopiths", Are Not Even Australopithecines !!! *
they Did Not "evolve from" australopiths …. they show a species invasive breach impacting hominins of their same time frame
so those that stayed in africa became 1/5th the species invasive primate.
and the rest of us have three blended instances, but also some mixing with clear eurasian archaic humans.
Overshoot One, Overshoot Two, And Then the second wave…
people of sub-saharan descent carry Species Invasive DNA
Blue zones blue zones
What I learned from this video:
1) It's ok to eat meat
2) If I cook my bagel instead of eating it raw, my digestion will improve by 99%
Thanks for the video 😝
💚🏜️
You are correct about illiostomy bags! Don't waste your time eating a salad roll especially with pickled beetroot hahaha or corn no no no ha
thanks for the video
IMO, looking at a paleo diet is silly when you have blue zone diets
Qweedffgghhzuhj
This channel loves low carb so they have an agenda. Something to keep in mind
The Chinese were using silk 10000 years ago while in many parts of the World they lived in caves and mud huts.the great pyramid was built 25000 years ago and today they cant build the same.
More of the same crap. we did not start as hunter gatherers,all wrong.she must have had a good pay to come talk this crap, thats why she is so nervous.we have our immortal brothers that teach us a deferent story.
I’ll watch this later
Our stone age ancestors would not have needed extra fat because they not only ate animals but wore them.
Volume so low. Too bad
You know what I love about this talk? There is no bias towards one diet or another. Thank you and thank God
In other words they eat whatever they could get their hands on
To the second guy, his whole argument about starches is debunked because Hadza hate starches, they prefer the fat of the animal they kill the best.
Saliva exchange has a purpose.?
Did anyone else hear her say, "large gay game animals?"
Where did we get the energy to feed our large brains?…. FAT! We cant get it from fiber like a gorilla, so we have to eat it.
There are many talks on this topic on Youtube.
This is the worst of them.
It says in the beginning of the video, "no commercial use only". So why the FUCK there is commersials IN THIS VIDEO!?
0:52 Symposium
Dec 7,2012
There is so many assumptions made in this video!
Meat would not be the most delicious food group (by far) if we hadn't evolved to eat plenty of it. Simple, i know; for i am a simple man.
Lesson for us today: eat real food. No processed food heavy in sugar useless starches and fake fats. No Mountain Dew and M&Ms. No frozen lasagna. If you become a fat burner like our ancestors you dont need to eat 6 times a day. You dont even need to eat every day.
Great series but they need a different mic setup for a speaker like the first one 😫
Why is more energy extraction the measure of good/bad? This is a major assumption to make for a Harvard Professor?? If more energy is better, then why not sprinkle the food with high-density glucose sources like cane sugar and honey? I don't get the reasoning.
Why is BMI the standard of measurement? I find it disturbing that the reasoning for this is not outlined. It seems that 'rawfooders' have lower BMI indicating that they are underweight? What is the point? I'm very curious, not attacking any of the research. 🙂
Humans eat what's available when they're hungry. It has nothing to do with the evolution hoax.
Poor research, or just poor conclusions–it's hard to tell. Nuts and seeds would have had ample fat that all humans need in their diet. The occasional "successful hunt" would have provided even more. Carbs are the luxury foods that make humans obese.
Im surprised ancesters had a fat free diet, just protein and carbs, very poor scientific study.
Anything coming out of cali I just wont take seriously…the most biased snobbish people I have ever met…so much so they absolutely refuse to investing other possibilities lol. Fk cali! Give it to mexico!
Glad I dropped in.
23:23 … Why leave fat out? Protein is not an energy source. Our ancestors were after fat, and probably ate meat because it was there, and tasted pretty good. Fat does not need cooking.
Worst speaker in the world, out of breath she has not good pace, it’s unbearable to listen to her sounds like she is talking while jogging
Why does she sound like she has a gun pointed to her head?
Lapel mic please 😊